![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNewDFVA2jRSP7QBBeed3znqkriV2HDewi2uF3QFGtoU9MNBnHwg0TlvM1xiCPHsnsaDhQdl684qxRPsrNuYvy_Xa2WRe51xyvzX1y33YctSt9BYZO1ATXmS7t8KyBB22t77Nd7eHjBVE/s400/The+bulletin.+1977-05-21clip0+%25281%2529.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7Ajvv3Dd3OY-atifsBDfpOUUpmbdcoLxFmecFbSqxcTnCz2c6ebHOFxM2zytYnbURU1ZP6BZ-BOBmVTgYuJmNuKTHIxKpdFD5V1MiJo5Q-pkTsnryWWKAe1mrN1hwvFf2PkybglwILtI/s400/The+bulletin.+1977-05-21clip0+%25282%2529.jpg)
“We love ya, Olivia,” headlined the New
York Daily News, but the New York
Times took a less enthusiastic view of the
Australian bred pop singer Olivia
Newton-John. After her sell-out concert
at the Metropolitan Opera House, Times
critic John Rockwell wrote that Olivia’s
“demonstrable niceness buoys up her
minimal art,” but added: “Why
America’s apparent need for a female
pop singer who blends images of the
crinolined, antebellum South with the
buoyancy of a modern-day Texas
cheerleader should be fulfilled by
somebody from England by way of
Australia remains one of life’s minor
mysteries.” A local gossip columnist
noted that the singer was unattached
since she broke up with her manager,
but decided that “she won’t be for long.”
Olivia Newton-John: one of life’s minor
mysteries to the New York Times.
Comentarios